Discovering The Concept Of The Writing Process

"Teach writing as a process, not a product." - Donald Murray

    Sometimes, the shortest quotes are the most effective. Murray's quote, above, is one that has been stuck in my head for quite a while. It reminds me of my own writing process throughout my years in school. Back then, writing was taught in one way: Zero errors created a masterpiece. There should be no grammatical errors, no spelling errors, no confusion, no missing ideas, no this, no that. There was a major emphasis on creating an unblemished piece. This 'perfect piece,' however, was only perfect in one way. It is true that there were no errors, but there was no voice. There was no personality and individuality in the work. Students aimed to please their assessors, rather than to express their minds. They didn't care about the process - they cared about the product. They were pushed into a box that was created by many of their teachers. "Three body paragraphs is all you need. Always start with a hook. There should be a comma there..." and blah, blah, blah. I don't completely disagree with some of these ideas; there should be proper writing techniques, and some are more effective than others, but there should also be wiggle room. Students should be able to find what fits their own style best in order to create their finest work. Their process should overpower their product.The Three-Part Writing Process | Business Communication Skills for Managers

    I have developed my own process over many years. When I first started, I would jump straight into the work. There was no forethought - just writing what came to my mind. After reading and rereading the paragraphs as I went on, I would give the piece a once-over. That was the only revision I had. This process, admittedly worked for a very long time. Why did it work so well? Because I knew how to tailor my pieces towards my assessors. I knew what my teachers were looking for, so that's what I would write. I find that many students tend to do this when they are still exploring their writing process. They don't care about the journey in writing their piece - they just want a good grade. My process has slowly transgressed past this mindset through many different experiences. I now start with brainstorming. I don't just use the first idea that comes to my head - I sit and think and reconsider and start all over again. After that, I start an outline. I begin to think about what I want to discuss and important points to include. Then, I add the meat. I revise as I go, but I also spew whatever words flow through my fingers. At the end, everything looks like a big mess - and that's okay! Because looking at this big mess, I have a ton of great ideas that I might not have found without gushing my words. I start to revise after this. As Spandel puts it, "A writer may rework a draft for publication three or four times, put it away for a while, and then rework it three or four more" (Spandel 68). This is exactly what I do. Revise, start again, revise, start again, revise, etc. It's an endless circle! 

    I have noticed that the mode of my writing will change my writing process. I still draft and redraft as well as revise and then revise again. However, when on paper, for example, I do not redraft as much. It is much more difficult and I find myself getting tired of it easily. I'm so used to being online and typing so quickly, that writing feels slow. If I am creating a video or writing a blog or whatever other modes, the process generally stays the same.


Comments

  1. Hi Olivia,

    I feel the same way about writing on paper vs typing. There are times when I'm writing and my hand can't keep up with my thoughts. I much prefer typing because I rarely miss any ideas or thoughts that way. I like to get all my thoughts out and then go through and organize, revise, rewrite; this process is more difficult when writing by hand. -Kelly

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Olivia! The quote you have at the beginning of your post is great, as is your graphic! I really enjoyed your breakdown of what was taught to be the 'perfect piece.' I'm a very strong believer in the fact that no piece of writing is truly perfect, because everyone's idea of perfect is so drastically different. For example, I love Stephen King and Rose Madder to me is a perfect book, but there are still times where I see typos and I physically cringe. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Olivia,
    I totally get what you mean by how writing is taught to be perfect, and perfection in writing is defined as no grammatical errors, no spelling errors, etc. The only problem with that kind of philosophy towards writing is that it tries to limit the writer, as you were saying, in a writing style like that there is no voice, no personality, no individuality. Writing like that to me isn't writing, because what makes writing special is that no two people write the same way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you, Olivia, for sharing here this image of the writing process. It is very helpful in showing how we definitely move into different mindsets throughout the process, yet the moving is continuous and circuitous, we churn our ideas through folding them on top of each other and continual revision. This illustration is so simple yet telling of this process.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts